arizona: establish residency, directly contravening federal law. after the governor signs the law, what would likely happen next? A. courts in other states use the law as precedent when deciding cases involving mexican immigrants. B. federal district courts in arizona would be obligated to decide cases based on the new law. C. the law would be invalidated based on the preemption doctrine. D. the law would have to be upheld by the supreme court before it could be enforced.|||Federal law always comes before state law. So in Arizona these immigrants would not be arrested by local law enforcement or brought to trial in a local court. However, INS would still arrest them and federal court would still deport them. Also, federal law enforcement could hold the state of Arizona financially responsible for the cost of arresting, detaining, and deporting these immigrants. It also seems to me that some public officials could be arrested for violating federal law.|||A legislator cannot propose a law that is bluntly unconstitutional. Be serious.|||Four Latin American countries accounted for 91 percent of therecord number of people deported in the recently-completed fiscal year. Nearly 363,000 of the 396,900 people deported by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in fiscal year 2011 were from Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, government figures show.|||C. One of the same reasons the anti-brown people law is unconstitutional.